The Birth: What the Heck is Twitter?

Welcome to Shum Stuff. Or if you want to re-punctuate, you could also consider Shum's Tuff. I'm pretty okay with either one. I'm a Shum, one of many. This is my stuff.

Let's get one thing straight from the beginning. Shum. It's pronounced exactly as it is spelled. Shhhhhh. Ummmmm. Put it together now: Shhhuuuuuuum. As you can tell, it's a bit of a pet-peeve to have my last name mispronounced. I could understand if it had multiple vowels, or at least two syllables, but it's about as simple as it gets. Shum. Rhymes with bum, dumb, thumb, and scum. If you can come up with a nickname I haven't heard before, you win a prize! A small, cheap, probably plastic prize. Possibly a pipe cleaner.

Moving on.

Not too long ago, I could not for-the-love-of-all-that's-holy figure out what the big deal was about Twitter. I had an account. I had followed about 10 people, and had about that many following me (lookout behind you!). I would log on about once a month, look around a little and not really get it. I'm a scientist (or pretend to be), so I don't really like it when I don't understand things. It was time to figure out why people tweet.

As any reasonable 21st century woman does when she wants to embark on a new adventure, I Googled it. The best advice I found was to be active. Tweet, respond, follow, jump into conversations. Unless you're a celebrity, people won't come to you. You need to engage them.

And so I did. I started tweeting something 2-3 times a day, whether it be retweeting, responding to a question or just plowing my way into someone else's conversation. But the real trouble started when I followed @JacquelynGill. If you are unfamiliar with this ecologist, biogeographer and twitter-fiend, check out her blog here. I retweeted a few articles she wrote and it started a conversation. People in her science-sphere saw our conversation and followed me. I did the polite thing and followed them back. 

Then things started to snowball. You see, the fascinating Dr Gill is heavily into science communication (#scicomm). Science communication is exactly what it sounds like. Communicating about science. This can be between scientists, journalists, the general public or combination thereof. Science research, science policy, science education. These people are obsessed with science and attempting to engage those around in conversations. It just so happens that they were all at a convention about science communication, causing them to really blow up the Twitter-verse.

By golly, I had no idea that this was a topic so fascinating. As a lab technician, I talk a lot of science every day. The few non-scientists I interact with on a regular basis know a-plenty about science by sheer virtue of interaction with moi. In this insular science-drenched world it's easy to forgot that a shocking number of people still discount global warming, evolution, or even the basic science needed to make educated opinions about their own health care.

Science communication is vastly important, and I'm hooked on being a part of it. Where is my place in all this? I don't know yet. Stay with me to find out.

I'm a Shum, and this is my stuff.